Journal of Diabetes Investigation (Feb 2021)

Association between tear and blood glucose concentrations: Random intercept model adjusted with confounders in tear samples negative for occult blood

  • Masakazu Aihara,
  • Naoto Kubota,
  • Takahiro Minami,
  • Rika Shirakawa,
  • Yoshitaka Sakurai,
  • Takanori Hayashi,
  • Masahiko Iwamoto,
  • Iseki Takamoto,
  • Tetsuya Kubota,
  • Ryo Suzuki,
  • Satoshi Usami,
  • Hideaki Jinnouchi,
  • Makoto Aihara,
  • Toshimasa Yamauchi,
  • Toshiya Sakata,
  • Takashi Kadowaki

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13344
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 2
pp. 266 – 276

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Aims/Introduction To prevent diabetic complications, strict glucose control and frequent monitoring of blood glucose levels with invasive methods are necessary. We considered the monitoring of tear glucose levels might be a possible method for non‐invasive glucose monitoring. To develop tear glucose monitoring for clinical application, we investigated the precise correlation between the blood and tear glucose concentrations. Materials and Methods A total of 10 participants and 20 participants with diabetes were admitted, and blood and tear samples were collected. Before statistical analysis, we eliminated tear samples contaminated with blood. We observed the daily blood and tear glucose dynamics, and carried out a random intercept model analysis to examine the association between the blood and tear glucose concentrations. Results Tear occult blood tests showed that the tear glucose concentrations and their variation increased in both participants with and without diabetes as contamination of blood increased. In both participants with and without diabetes, fluctuations of the plasma glucose concentrations were observed depending on the timing of collection of the samples, and the dynamics of the tear glucose concentrations paralleled those of the plasma glucose concentrations. The random intercept model analysis showed a significant association between the plasma and tear glucose concentrations in participants with diabetes (P < 0.001). This association still existed even after adjusting for the glycated hemoglobin levels and the prandial state (P < 0.001). Conclusions It is important to eliminate the tear samples contaminated with blood. Tear glucose monitoring might be a reliable and non‐invasive substitute method for monitoring the blood glucose concentrations for diabetes patients, irrespective of glycated hemoglobin levels and timing of sample collection.

Keywords