Cogent Medicine (Jan 2017)

Factors associated with the decision-making process in palliative sedation therapy. The experience of an Italian hospice struggling with balancing various individual autonomies

  • Endrizzi Cristina,
  • Senore Carlo,
  • D’Amico Gabriella,
  • Palella Mirella

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2017.1290307
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

In this observational and retrospective study, the authors aimed to evaluate how the practice of palliative terminal sedation therapy (PST) in a hospice setting has changed in a given period of clinical activity and which psychosocial factors have influenced it. We considered the prevalence of palliative/terminal sedation therapy (PST) and the prevalence of some factors associated with the decision-making process in PST (awareness of death, impairment of cognitive function, discussion of sedation with physicians, etc.). Despite a downward trend in patients without awareness of death, the interlocutor of the decision-making process is always the caregiver (44 vs. 28% for the patient). Furthermore, the probability that conscious sedation preceded deep sedation was significantly reduced when the principal interlocutor in the decision-making process was the caregiver. The weight of the decision-making of the patient seems to be relative to an awareness of the death process and the families’ responsibility is a relevant aspect in advanced care planning.

Keywords