Insights into Imaging (May 2024)

How to report perinatal and paediatric postmortem CT

  • Susan C. Shelmerdine,
  • Owen J. Arthurs

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01698-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Postmortem CT (PMCT) has become increasingly accepted alongside skeletal surveys as a critical part of investigation in childhood deaths, either as part of a suite of non-invasive investigations through parental choice, or comprehensive evaluation in a forensic setting. Whilst CT image acquisition and protocols have been published and are relatively standardised, CT imaging reporting remains highly variable, largely dependent upon reporter experience and expertise. The main “risk” in PMCT is the over-interpretation of normal physiological changes on imaging as pathological, potentially leading to misdiagnosis or overdiagnosis of the disease. In this article, we present a pragmatic standardised reporting framework, developed over a decade of PMCT reporting in children in our institution, with examples of positive and negative findings, so that it may aid in the interpretation of PMCT images with those less experienced in paediatric findings and postmortem imaging. Critical relevance statement Standardised reporting using a common framework with a sound understanding of normal postmortem changes that occur in children are crucial in avoiding common reporting errors at postmortem CT. Key Points Familiarity with postmortem imaging is required for useful image reporting, and reporting standards vary. Understanding normal postmortem change from significant abnormalities requires training and experience. Following a template may remind reporters what to include and help improve performance. Graphical Abstract

Keywords