Efficacy of Combining Multiple Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy Modalities for Diagnosing Lung Nodules

Abstract

Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) is one of the non-invasive methods used for lung nodule biopsy. We evaluated the efficacy of combining radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS)-guided transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) with ENB-guided TBLB or transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) for diagnosing lung nodules. Forty patients with a lung nodule underwent ENB-TBLB or TBNA, followed by R-EBUS-TBLB if available. The final diagnosis was benign or malignant, depending on the surgical pathology or 24-month follow-up computed tomography (CT). We compared the sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy between combinations of procedures. The mean nodule size was 21.65 mm, and 60.0% of the nodules were solid. The bronchus was within the nodule in 67.5% and 65.0% of cases examined using CT and R-EBUS, respectively. The accuracies of ENB-TBLB alone, ENB-TBLB/TBNA, and R-EBUS-TBLB plus ENB-TBLB/TBNA were 74.4%, 82.5%, and 90.0%, respectively. The sensitivity levels of the aforementioned procedures were 69.8%, 78.8%, and 87.9%, respectively. Among 21 patients who underwent both ENB-TBLB and R-EBUS-TBLB, the latter revealed malignant cells in three of nine patients (33.3%) with benign ENB-TBLB results. Combined ENB-TBLB/TBNA and R-EBUS-TBLB had increased sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy for lung nodules. ENB and R-EBUS are complementary; using both modalities improves the sensitivity and accuracy of lung nodule diagnoses.

Keywords

• electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy
• radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy
• lung nodule