Journal of Bone and Joint Infection (Jan 2017)

Which Orthopaedic Patients Are Infected with Gram-negative Non-fermenting Rods?

  • O. Jamei,
  • S. Gjoni,
  • B. Zenelaj,
  • B. Kressmann,
  • B. Kressmann,
  • W. Belaieff,
  • D. Hannouche,
  • I. Uçkay,
  • I. Uçkay

DOI
https://doi.org/10.7150/jbji.17171
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2
pp. 73 – 76

Abstract

Read online

Background: 1st and 2nd generation cephalosporins used for perioperative prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery do not cover non-fermenting Gram-negative rods (NFR).Methods: Epidemiological cohort study of adult patients operated for orthopedic infections between 2004 and 2014 with perioperative cefuroxim or vancomycin prophylaxis. Exclusion of polyneuropathic ischemic foot infections and septic bursitis cases.Results: Of the total 1840 surgical procedures in the study, 430 grew Gram-negative pathogens (23%), of which 194 (11%) were due to NFR and 143 (8%) to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Overall, 634 episodes (35%) involved orthopaedic implants (321 arthroplasties, 135 plates, 53 nails, and others). In multivariate analysis and group comparisons, especially preoperative antibiotic use (124/194 vs. 531/1456; p<0.01) was significantly associated with NFR.Conclusions: Overall proportion of NFR oscillated between 9% and 13% among our orthopaedic infections. Variables associated with NFR were antibiotic use prior to hospitalization. The low infection rate of NFR following elective surgery and the community-based epidemiology, has led us to keep our standard perioperative prophylaxis unchanged.