Journal of Translational Medicine (Nov 2022)

Sepax-2 cell processing device: a study assessing reproducibility of concentrating thawed hematopoietic progenitor cells

  • Bechara Mfarrej,
  • Olivier Vicari,
  • Sarah Ouffai,
  • Carine Malenfant,
  • Angela Granata,
  • Sophie Thevenet,
  • Christian Chabannon,
  • Claude Lemarié,
  • Boris Calmels

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03703-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 20, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation is currently the standard of care for a fraction of patients with newly diagnosed myelomas and relapsed or refractory lymphomas. After high-dose chemotherapy, cryopreserved HPC are either infused directly after bedside thawing or washed and concentrated before infusion. We previously reported on the comparability of washing/concentrating HPC post-thaw vs. infusion without manipulation in terms of hematopoietic engraftment, yet settled for the prior favoring cell debris and DMSO removal. For almost two decades, automation of this critical step of washing/concentrating cells has been feasible. As part of continuous process verification, we aim to evaluate reproducibility of this procedure by assessing intra-batch and inter-batch variability upon concentration of thawed HPC products using the Sepax 2 S-100 cell separation system. Methods Autologous HPC collected from the same patient were thawed and washed either in two batches processed within a 3-4 h interval and immediately infused on the same day (intra-batch, n = 45), or in two batches on different days (inter-batch, n = 49) for those patients requiring 2 or more high-dose chemotherapy cycles. Quality attributes assessed were CD34+ cell recovery, viability and CD45+ viability; CFU assay was only performed for allogeneic grafts. Results Intra-batch and inter-batch median CD34+ cell recovery was comparable (75% vs. 73% and 77% vs. 77%, respectively). Similarly, intra-batch and inter-batch median CD45+ cell viability was comparable (79% vs. 80% and 79% vs. 78%, respectively). Bland-Altman analysis describing agreement between batches per patient revealed a bias close to 0%. Additionally, lower HPC recoveries noted in batch 1 were noted as well in batch 2, regardless of the CD34+ cell dose before cryopreservation, both intra- and inter-batch, suggesting that the quality of the collected product plays an important role in downstream recovery. Intrinsic (high mature and immature granulocyte content) and extrinsic (delay between apheresis and cryopreservation) variables of the collected product resulted in a significantly lower CD45+ viability and CD34+ cell recovery upon thawing/washing. Conclusions Automated post-thaw HPC concentration provides reproducible cell recoveries and viabilities between different batches. Implications of this work go beyond HPC to concentrate cell suspension/products during manufacturing of cell and gene therapy products.

Keywords