Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette (Feb 2023)

Egyptian pediatric clinical practice adapted guidelines: evidence-based [2] steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) 2022

  • Bahia Moustafa,
  • Sawsan Moselhy,
  • Moftah Rabie,
  • Ayman Hammad,
  • Doaa Youssef,
  • Mohamed Shouman,
  • Samuel Makar,
  • Ahmed Badr,
  • Sameh Mansour,
  • Dina Ebrahim,
  • Marwa Nabhan,
  • Fatma Ateia,
  • Hend Abdel-Nabi,
  • Ahmed Hussein,
  • Manal Salman,
  • Mai S. Korkor,
  • Esraa A. Elbahkiry,
  • Marwa Dagher,
  • Abeer Selim,
  • Yasser S. Amer,
  • Tarek Omar,
  • Ashraf Abdel Baky,
  • on behalf of the Egyptian Pediatric Clinical Practice Guidelines (EPG) Committee (Chairman Ashraf Abdel Baky), SRNS Clinical & Methodology work group

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43054-022-00118-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 71, no. 1
pp. 1 – 18

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Nephrotic syndrome is one of the most common chronic kidney diseases in children. Steroid sensitive type (SSNS) constitutes about 85–90%, whereas steroid-resistant type (SRNS) only 15–20% (Mickinney et al. Pediatr Nephrol 16:1040-1044, 2001). While MCD is the most common histopathology in SS type, children with SRNS have MCD, mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis, or focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) (International Study Kidney Disease in children, Kidney Int 20;765-771, 1981). SRNS is defined as those who do not show remission after 6 weeks and standard dose of oral steroids ± 3 IV MPD doses (Trautmann et al. Pediatr Nephrol 35:1529-1561, 2020). Objectives These national adapted guidelines aim to frame evidence-based recommendations adopted or adapted from the IPNA 2020, KDIGO 2021, and Japanese 2014 de novo guidelines for diagnosis and management of nephrotic children to be presented in two manuscripts: (1) steroid sensitive (SSNS) and (2) steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). Methodology Formulation of key questions was followed with a review of literature guided by our appraised guidelines using AGREE plus appraisal tool. Virtual monthly meetings all through the year 2021 were activated for reviewing and validation of final adaptation evidence-based draft, considering all comments of external reviewers including KDIGO assigned reviewer. Discussion Rationale behind the selection of adopted statements and tailoring of others to suit our local facilities, expertise, and our local disease profile was discussed in the text with reasons. Conclusion The provided guidelines aim to optimize patient care and outcome and suggest research areas lacking validated research recommendations.

Keywords