In Autumn 2020, DOAJ will be relaunching with a new website with updated functionality, improved search, and a simplified application form. More information is available on our blog. Our API is also changing.

Hide this message

Transcription profiling provides insights into gene pathways involved in horn and scurs development in cattle

BMC Genomics. 2010;11(1):370 DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-11-370


Journal Homepage

Journal Title: BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164 (Online)

Publisher: BMC

LCC Subject Category: Technology: Chemical technology: Biotechnology | Science: Biology (General): Genetics

Country of publisher: United Kingdom

Language of fulltext: English

Full-text formats available: PDF, HTML



Lehnert Sigrid A

Barris Wes

Reverter Antonio

Mariasegaram Maxy

Dalrymple Brian

Prayaga Kishore


Blind peer review

Editorial Board

Instructions for authors

Time From Submission to Publication: 17 weeks


Abstract | Full Text

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Two types of horns are evident in cattle - fixed horns attached to the skull and a variation called scurs, which refers to small loosely attached horns. Cattle lacking horns are referred to as polled. Although both the <it>Poll </it>and <it>Scurs </it>loci have been mapped to BTA1 and 19 respectively, the underlying genetic basis of these phenotypes is unknown, and so far, no candidate genes regulating these developmental processes have been described. This study is the first reported attempt at transcript profiling to identify genes and pathways contributing to horn and scurs development in Brahman cattle, relative to polled counterparts.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Expression patterns in polled, horned and scurs tissues were obtained using the Agilent 44 k bovine array. The most notable feature when comparing transcriptional profiles of developing horn tissues against polled was the down regulation of genes coding for elements of the cadherin junction as well as those involved in epidermal development. We hypothesize this as a key event involved in keratinocyte migration and subsequent horn development. In the polled-scurs comparison, the most prevalent differentially expressed transcripts code for genes involved in extracellular matrix remodelling, which were up regulated in scurs tissues relative to polled.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>For this first time we describe networks of genes involved in horn and scurs development. Interestingly, we did not observe differential expression in any of the genes present on the fine mapped region of BTA1 known to contain the <it>Poll </it>locus.</p>