Cancer Medicine (Mar 2023)

Mutation patterns and evolutionary action score of TP53 enable identification of a patient population with poor prognosis in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer

  • Wensheng Jiang,
  • Huanqing Cheng,
  • Lili Yu,
  • Jie Zhang,
  • Yihui Wang,
  • Yun Liang,
  • Feng Lou,
  • Huina Wang,
  • Shanbo Cao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5447
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 6
pp. 6649 – 6658

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background TP53 mutations are frequent in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Different categories of TP53 mutations may be associated with survival in advanced NSCLC, but their effect on prognosis is diverse. To date, a comprehensive comparison of the relationship between different classes of TP53 alterations and survival in advanced NSCLC has rarely been performed. Moreover, the prognostic significance of a novel approach called the evolutionary action of TP53 (EAp53) in advanced NSCLC is unclear. Methods A total of 210 patients with NSCLC harboring TP53 mutation data were enrolled. Genomic and clinical data for the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) cohort with advanced NSCLC were obtained from cBioPortal. Relationship between clinical characteristics and TP53 mutations was performed by Fisher's exact test or χ2 test. Overall survival (OS) analysis was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results TP53 mutations were identified in 51.4% of NSCLC patients and were mainly located in exons 5, 7, and 8. The distribution patterns of missense and truncating mutations of TP53 were remarkably different. Among patients with advanced NSCLC who never received immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments, EAp53 high‐risk mutations were significantly associated with poor OS in both our cohort and the MSKCC cohort. Moreover, marked differences were observed in the mutational landscape between patients with EAp53 high‐risk mutations (HR group) and other patients (OT group). The HR group displayed higher mutation frequencies in the RTK, cell cycle, and DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways than the OT group. In addition, the tumor mutation burden in the HR group was significantly higher than that in the OT group. Conclusions This study provided important insights into the molecular‐clinical profile of TP53‐mutated NSCLC patients. Moreover, the data revealed that EAp53 high‐risk mutations were an independent prognostic factor for worse OS in advanced NSCLC.

Keywords