GESTÃO DA OBRA PÚBLICA: UMA ANÁLISE COMPARATIVA DOS ADITIVOS DE VALOR E DE PRAZO ENTRE DUAS INSTITUIÇÕES FEDERAIS DE ENSINO

Abstract

The public constructions promote a great movement of resources. Both the commercial media and academic literature report frequent changes during the execution phase of the construction contracts, mainly of value and duration, through the so-called contractual amendments. The objective of this article is to analyze the occurrences of the value and duration amendments in the construction contracts carried out by UFTM and IFTM since their creation, with emphasis on the different sizes of the constructions, performing statistical analysis, and comparing results between the institutions. These institutions were chosen due to their participation in the expansion and adaptation of the physical infrastructure of the federal educational institutions by the Federal Government and, also, because they are located in the same geographic region. In order to collect the data, the documentation of the construction contracts were consulted. After analyzing the results, it was observed that as the size of the new constructions increased in the UFTM, statistically, the percentage average value amendment was higher. It was also verified that the percentage averages of the duration amendment of medium and large-size construction of both institutions are statistically equal. Through the analysis of the main causes of construction contract amendments, managers can make more effective decisions, aiming to reduce the number and value of contracts amendments, since they impact not only the planning and execution of the contracts, but also the budget of the institutions.

Keywords

• public constructions
• amendments value
• amendments deadline
• causes