Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology (Nov 2021)
Abstract 1122‐000181: Collateral Circulation in Ischemic Stroke is Not Determined by Anatomical Variants of the Cerebral Arteries
Abstract
Introduction: In acute ischemic stroke, collateral circulation determines tissue fate and treatment results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of anatomical variations of the Circle of Willis (CoW) in formation of cerebral collateral blood flow in patients with acute M1 occlusion. Methods: This study was a retrospective assessment of radiological examinations of patients with stroke due to middle cerebral artery M1 segment occlusion. All patients underwent mechanical thrombectomy from January 2015 until March 2021. The anatomy of the CoW was assessed on initial CT‐angiography and DSA. CTA was utilized to grade cranial collateral vasculature status and cortical vein opacification score (COVES). Non‐contrast CT scans and ASPECTS scores (using RAPID software) were used to determine the ischemic area. Results: A total of 100 patients were included in the analysis (58 females and 42 males, mean age: 71.6 +/‐ 13.9). We classified the anatomy of the CoW according to its continuity as a full circle. Patients with fully continuous CoW (n = 19) had worse COVES scores than those with CoW incomplete at both anterior and posterior portion (n = 9) (89% vs 68% with COVES 0–2, p = 0.179). No statistically significant results were found when comparing the enhancement of collaterals between these two groups (p = 0.390). The COVES scores were similar for patients with complete and incomplete anterior portions of CoW (77% vs 80% with COVES 0–2, p = 0.812). Patients with incomplete posterior portions of CoW had lower COVES scores than those with complete (80% vs 67% with COVES 0–2, p = 0.206). No statistically significant differences were discovered when comparing different types of the posterior communicating artery (adult, transitional and fetal). Analysis of ischemic areas determined as ASPECTS scores pre‐ and post‐thrombectomy yielded no significant differences between any of the groups. Conclusions: Although certain variants of the CoW have been reported to increase the risk of ischemic stroke, our results show that the anatomy of CoW has no large effect on collateral blood flow during acute M1 occlusion. We presume that the greater role is played by pial arterioles than anatomical variants of major cerebral arteries in cerebral collateral circulation formation. Detailed knowledge about the factors that influence collateral blood flow is crucial as it may aid in identification of patients prone to worse outcomes of ischemic stroke. Anatomical variants of CoW do not play a major role in formation of cerebral collaterals.
Keywords