Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open (Dec 2020)

Contemporary hemodynamic monitoring, fluid responsiveness, volume optimization, and endpoints of resuscitation: an AAST critical care committee clinical consensus

  • Karen Brasel,
  • Niels D Martin,
  • Dennis Kim,
  • David Zonies,
  • Panna Codner,
  • Pauline Park,
  • Matthew Lissauer,
  • Susan Evans,
  • Christine Cocanour,
  • Rachael Callcut,
  • Joe Cuschieri,
  • Heather Dolman,
  • David Gourlay,
  • Addison May,
  • Christopher Michetti,
  • Travis Polk,
  • Ronald Simon,
  • Melvin Stone,
  • Sonlee West,
  • Wendy Greene,
  • Alexander Axelrad,
  • Charles Adams,
  • Michaela West,
  • Richard Bagdonas

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2019-000411
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

This article, on hemodynamic monitoring, fluid responsiveness, volume assessment, and endpoints of resuscitation, is part of a compendium of guidelines provided by the AAST (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma) critical care committee. The intention of these guidelines is to inform practitioners with practical clinical guidance. To do this effectively and contemporarily, expert consensus via the critical care committee was obtained. Strict guideline methodology such a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) was purposefully NOT used so as not to limit the possible clinical guidance. The critical care committee foresees this methodology as practically valuable to the bedside clinician.