PLoS Biology (Jun 2021)

A return-on-investment approach for prioritization of rigorous taxonomic research needed to inform responses to the biodiversity crisis.

  • Jane Melville,
  • David G Chapple,
  • J Scott Keogh,
  • Joanna Sumner,
  • Andrew Amey,
  • Phil Bowles,
  • Ian G Brennan,
  • Patrick Couper,
  • Stephen C Donnellan,
  • Paul Doughty,
  • Danielle L Edwards,
  • Ryan J Ellis,
  • Damien Esquerré,
  • Jéssica Fenker,
  • Michael G Gardner,
  • Arthur Georges,
  • Margaret L Haines,
  • Conrad J Hoskin,
  • Mark Hutchinson,
  • Craig Moritz,
  • James Nankivell,
  • Paul Oliver,
  • Carlos J Pavón-Vázquez,
  • Mitzy Pepper,
  • Daniel L Rabosky,
  • Kate Sanders,
  • Glenn Shea,
  • Sonal Singhal,
  • Jessica Worthington Wilmer,
  • Reid Tingley

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001210
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 6
p. e3001210

Abstract

Read online

Global biodiversity loss is a profound consequence of human activity. Disturbingly, biodiversity loss is greater than realized because of the unknown number of undocumented species. Conservation fundamentally relies on taxonomic recognition of species, but only a fraction of biodiversity is described. Here, we provide a new quantitative approach for prioritizing rigorous taxonomic research for conservation. We implement this approach in a highly diverse vertebrate group-Australian lizards and snakes. Of 870 species assessed, we identified 282 (32.4%) with taxonomic uncertainty, of which 17.6% likely comprise undescribed species of conservation concern. We identify 24 species in need of immediate taxonomic attention to facilitate conservation. Using a broadly applicable return-on-investment framework, we demonstrate the importance of prioritizing the fundamental work of identifying species before they are lost.