Environment International (Feb 2022)
Potential importance of residual confounding in systematic reviews of observational studies: Answer to Mathur and VanderTweele
- Jos H. Verbeek,
- Paul Whaley,
- Rebecca L. Morgan,
- Kyla W. Taylor,
- Andrew A. Rooney,
- Lukas Schwingshackl,
- Jan L. Hoving,
- S. Vittal Katikireddi,
- Beverley Shea,
- Reem A. Mustafa,
- M.Hassan Murad,
- Holger J. Schünemann
Affiliations
- Jos H. Verbeek
- Cochrane Work, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Corresponding author.
- Paul Whaley
- Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, UK
- Rebecca L. Morgan
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Kyla W. Taylor
- National Institute of Environment Health Science, United States
- Andrew A. Rooney
- National Institute of Environment Health Science, United States
- Lukas Schwingshackl
- Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Jan L. Hoving
- Cochrane Work, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- S. Vittal Katikireddi
- University of Glasgow, UK
- Beverley Shea
- University of Ottawa, Canada
- Reem A. Mustafa
- University of Kansas Medical Center, United States
- M.Hassan Murad
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
- Holger J. Schünemann
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Journal volume & issue
-
Vol. 160
p. 107010