Indian Journal of Ophthalmology (Jan 2022)

Evaluation of a revised care plan for babies with retinopathy of prematurity during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in India

  • Dinesh Narayan Suhan,
  • Avinash Singh,
  • Utpal Bhusal,
  • Bhavik Panchal,
  • Komal Agarwal,
  • Sameera Nayak,
  • Sameer Nayak,
  • Sushma Jayanna,
  • Taraprasad Das,
  • Subhadra Jalali,
  • Vishal Sanjay Jadhav,
  • Tapas Ranjan Padhi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_133_22
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 70, no. 7
pp. 2480 – 2484

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: To analyze the impact of a revised care plan for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in a tertiary eye care facility in eastern India. Methods: In a retrospective study, we analyzed the medical records of babies managed for ROP during the peak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with particular reference to the challenges, and the revised strategies addressing travel restrictions for five months, from April to August 2020. The strategy included selective referral (babies with higher treatment probability), longer follow-up intervals (babies with non-alarming findings), use of locally available workforce, and teleconsultation whenever feasible. Results: In the given period, 222 babies were examined versus 624 in the preceding year (P = 0.001). The average gestational age, birth weight, and postmenstrual age at presentation were 30.4 weeks, 1.31 kg, and 37.7 weeks, respectively. The first examination was on time in 40.1% of babies but was delayed by a median of 23 days in the remaining babies. In the cohort, 56.7% of babies had any ROP, and 27.9% required treatment (versus 8.8% in the previous year; P < 0.001). The intravitreal anti–vascular growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection was more often used than in the previous year (n = 72 vs 36; P < 0.0001). The treatment outcome was comparable before and after the SARS-CoV-2 lockdown period. There was no report of health issues among the care providers attributable to ROP care. Conclusion: The revised strategy resulted in a smaller pool of babies screened but a larger proportion of babies treated for ROP. This strategy could be used more profitably in future ROP care.

Keywords