Pathogens (Jun 2023)

Comparison of Three Serologic Tests for the Detection of Anti-<i>Coxiella burnetii</i> Antibodies in Patients with Q Fever

  • Danilo Alves de França,
  • Mateus de Souza Ribeiro Mioni,
  • Felipe Fornazari,
  • Nássarah Jabur Lot Rodrigues,
  • Lucas Roberto Ferreira Polido,
  • Camila Michele Appolinario,
  • Bruna Letícia Devidé Ribeiro,
  • Ana Íris de Lima Duré,
  • Marcos Vinicius Ferreira Silva,
  • Virgínia Bodelão Richini-Pereira,
  • Helio Langoni,
  • Jane Megid

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12070873
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 7
p. 873

Abstract

Read online

The performance of a commercial immunofluorescence assay (IFA commercial), an in-house immunofluorescence assay (IFA in-house) and an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were evaluated in the detection of antibodies anti-C. burnetii in the serum of Q fever patients and persons without the disease. For the study, seropositive and seronegative samples for Q fever (n = 200) from a serum bank of the Instituto Adolfo Lutz in Brazil were used. Commercial IFA was considered in this study as the gold standard for diagnosing Q fever. The in-house IFA demonstrated good agreement with the commercial test, showing high sensitivity (91%) and specificity (97%) compared to the gold standard, with a Kappa coefficient of 0.8954. The indirect ELISA test showed lower agreement with the gold standard, showing low sensitivity (67%), although the specificity of the technique was high (97%) and the Kappa coefficient was moderate (0.6631). In-house IFA is an excellent alternative for diagnosing Q fever.

Keywords