Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology (Feb 2021)

Evaluation of Autof MS 1000 and Vitek MS MALDI-TOF MS System in Identification of Closely-Related Yeasts Causing Invasive Fungal Diseases

  • Qiaolian Yi,
  • Meng Xiao,
  • Meng Xiao,
  • Xin Fan,
  • Ge Zhang,
  • Yang Yang,
  • Jing-Jia Zhang,
  • Si-Meng Duan,
  • Jing-Wei Cheng,
  • Ying Li,
  • Meng-Lan Zhou,
  • Shu-Ying Yu,
  • Jing-Jing Huang,
  • Xin-Fei Chen,
  • Xin Hou,
  • Fanrong Kong,
  • Timothy Kudinha,
  • Timothy Kudinha,
  • Ying-Chun Xu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.628828
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has been accepted as a rapid, accurate, and less labor-intensive method in the identification of microorganisms in clinical laboratories. However, there is limited data on systematic evaluation of its effectiveness in the identification of phylogenetically closely-related yeast species. In this study, we evaluated two commercially available MALDI-TOF systems, Autof MS 1000 and Vitek MS, for the identification of yeasts within closely-related species complexes. A total of 1,228 yeast isolates, representing 14 different species of five species complexes, including 479 of Candida parapsilosis complex, 323 of Candida albicans complex, 95 of Candida glabrata complex, 16 of Candida haemulonii complex (including two Candida auris), and 315 of Cryptococcus neoformans complex, collected under the National China Hospital Invasive Fungal Surveillance Net (CHIF-NET) program, were studied. Autof MS 1000 and Vitek MS systems correctly identified 99.2% and 89.2% of the isolates, with major error rate of 0.4% versus 1.6%, and minor error rate of 0.1% versus 3.5%, respectively. The proportion of isolates accurately identified by Autof MS 1000 and Vitek MS per each yeast complex, respectively, was as follows; C. albicans complex, 99.4% vs 96.3%; C. parapsilosis complex, 99.0% vs 79.1%; C glabrata complex, 98.9% vs 94.7%; C. haemulonii complex, 100% vs 93.8%; and C. neoformans, 99.4% vs 95.2%. Overall, Autof MS 1000 exhibited good capacity in yeast identification while Vitek MS had lower identification accuracy, especially in the identification of less common species within phylogenetically closely-related species complexes.

Keywords