The Pan African Medical Journal (Jun 2020)

Comparing hospital stay and patient satisfaction in a resource poor setting using conventional and locally adapted negative pressure wound dressing methods in management of leg ulcers with split skin grafts: a comparative prospective study

  • Charles Chidiebele Maduba,
  • Ugochukwu Uzodimma Nnadozie,
  • Victor Ifeanyichukwu Modekwe,
  • Ezekiel Uchechukwu Nwankwo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2020.36.105.19961
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 36, no. 105

Abstract

Read online

INTRODUCTION: Chronic leg ulcers cause a prolonged hospital stay with devastating effects on the patients. Several modifiable factors are taken care of to reduce the duration of stay. A further measure to hasten wound bed preparation pre-grafting and to hasten graft healing post-grafting is with negative pressure dressing. METHODS: sixty-two patients placed in two groups of 31 cases each. The wound beds were prepared with negative pressure apparatus locally adapted with suction machine for group A and with conventional gauze dressing using 5% povidone iodine soaks for group B. Grafted wound was also dressed similarly for the respective groups. Grafts were inspected on the 5th post-operative day and were determined with planimeter grid. Grafts were monitored until completely healed and patients were discharged. Satisfaction and length of stay were determined at discharge. RESULTS: the mean hospital stay pre-grafting and post-grafting were 12.2 (±8.64) days and 13.6 (±2.03) days respectively for the negative pressure dressing and 28.8 (±30.9) days and 21.8 (±21.97) days respectively for the traditional dressing group. These differences with p values of 0.038 for the pre-grafting stay and 0.006 for the post-grafting stay were statistically significant. The patients managed with negative pressure dressing also recorded greater satisfaction with the process and the outcome. CONCLUSION: negative pressure dressing contributes significantly to reducing the length of hospital stay in chronic leg ulcer both in wound bed preparation and in graft healing resulting to better patient satisfaction than in patients treated with conventional gauze dressing and 5% povidone iodine soaks.

Keywords