Scientific Reports (Nov 2017)

Comparison of graphical optimization or IPSA for improving brachytheraphy plans associated with inadequate target coverage for cervical cancer

  • ZhiJie Liu,
  • HuanQing Liang,
  • Xiao Wang,
  • HaiMing Yang,
  • Ye Deng,
  • TingJun Luo,
  • ChaoFeng Yang,
  • Min Lu,
  • QingGuo Fu,
  • XiaoDong Zhu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16756-w
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Many studies have reported that inverse planning by simulated annealing (IPSA) can improve the quality of brachytherapy plans, and we wanted to examine whether IPSA could improve cervical cancer brachytherapy plans giving D90 < 6 Gy (with 7 Gy per fraction) at our institution. Various IPSA plans involving the tandem and ovoid applicators were developed for 30 consecutive cervical cancer patients on the basis of computed tomography: IPSA1, with a constraint on the maximum dose in the target volume; IPSA1-0, identical to IPSA1 but without a dwell-time deviation constraint; IPSA2, without a constraint on the maximum dose; and IPSA2-0, identical to IPSA2 but without a dwell-time deviation constraint. IPSA2 achieved similar results as graphical optimization, and none of the other IPSA plans was significantly better than graphical optimization. Therefore, other approaches, such as combining interstitial and intracavitary brachytherapy, may be more appropriate for improving the quality of brachytherapy plans associated with inadequate target coverage.