Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics (Jan 2023)

Prediction of hamstring tendon autograft diameter using preoperative measurements with different cut‐offs between genders

  • Mohammad Movahedinia,
  • Sajjadeh Movahedinia,
  • Seyedreza Hosseini,
  • Ali Motevallizadeh,
  • Bentolhoda Salehi,
  • Babak Shekarchi,
  • Mostafa Shahrezaee

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00569-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Purpose Studies have suggested some predictors for hamstring tendon (HT) autograft diameter based on anthropometric factors and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with variable results. Some authors have attributed the variability to gender differences. This prospective cohort reports the sensitivity and specificity of anthropometric and MRI predictors in males and females separately to determine the difference. Methods Forty‐two eligible patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and MRI in our center were included. ACLR was performed by the senior surgeon using a 4‐stranded HT autograft for all patients. A blinded musculoskeletal radiologist measured the cross‐sectional area (CSA) of gracilis and semitendinosus tendons using the free‐hand region of interest tool for all patients. An orthopaedic resident (PGY4) collected anthropometric factors and measured intraoperative autograft diameter. Results Mean intraoperative autograft diameter was 8.0 mm. Females had a significantly lower autograft diameter (7.4 vs. 8.2, P < 0.001), smaller gracilis (6.9 vs. 7.9, P = 0.003) and semitendinosus CSA (11.5 vs. 12.8, P = 0.014) compared to males. ROC curve analysis resulted different cut‐off values with high sensitivity and specificity for semitendinosus and combined CSA regarding gender. Conclusion Based on the results of this study, CSA of either isolated or combined HTs on preoperative axial MRI, height, and weight are the strongest predictors of intraoperative autograft diameter. It is suggested to consider different cut‐offs for males and females to have a better clinical guide for surgeons. Level of evidence Level II.

Keywords