BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (Sep 2024)

Continuous adaptation of conversation aids for uterine fibroids treatment options in a four-year multi-center implementation project

  • Danielle Schubbe,
  • Marie-Anne Durand,
  • Rachel C. Forcino,
  • Jaclyn Engel,
  • Marisa Tomaino,
  • Monica Adams-Foster,
  • Carla Bacon,
  • Carrie Cahill Mulligan,
  • Sateria Venable,
  • Tina Foster,
  • Paul J. Barr,
  • Raymond M. Anchan,
  • Shannon Laughlin-Tommaso,
  • Anne Lindholm,
  • Maya Seshan,
  • Rossella M. Gargiulo,
  • Patricia Stephenson,
  • Karen George,
  • Mobolaji Ajao,
  • Tessa Madden,
  • Erika Banks,
  • Antonio R. Gargiulo,
  • James O’Malley,
  • Maria van den Muijsenbergh,
  • Johanna W. M. Aarts,
  • Glyn Elwyn

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02637-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Fibroids are non-cancerous uterine growths that can cause symptoms impacting quality of life. The breadth of treatment options allows for patient-centered preference. While conversation aids are known to facilitate shared decision making, the implementation of these aids for uterine fibroids treatments is limited. We aimed to develop two end-user-acceptable uterine fibroids conversation aids for an implementation project. Our second aim was to outline the adaptations that were made to the conversation aids as implementation occurred. Methods We used a multi-phase user-centered participatory approach to develop a text-based and picture-enhanced conversation aid for uterine fibroids. We conducted a focus group with project stakeholders and user-testing interviews with eligible individuals with symptomatic uterine fibroids. We analyzed the results of the user-testing interviews using Morville’s Honeycomb framework. Spanish translations of the conversation aids occurred in parallel with the English iterations. We documented the continuous adaptations of the conversation aids that occurred during the project using an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions (FRAME). Results The first iteration of the conversation aids was developed in December 2018. Focus group participants (n = 6) appreciated the brevity of the tools and suggested changes to the bar graphs and illustrations used in the picture-enhanced version. User-testing with interview participants (n = 9) found that both conversation aids were satisfactory, with minor changes suggested. However, during implementation, significant changes were suggested by patients, other stakeholders, and participating clinicians when they reviewed the content. The most significant changes required the addition or deletion of information about treatment options as newer research was published or as novel interventions were introduced into clinical practice. Conclusions This multi-year project revealed the necessity of continuously adapting the uterine fibroids conversation aids so they remain acceptable in an implementation and sustainability context. Therefore, it is important to seek regular user feedback and plan for the need to undertake updates and revisions to conversation aids if they are going to be acceptable for clinical use.

Keywords