BMC Health Services Research (May 2023)

Effectiveness of system navigation programs linking primary care with community-based health and social services: a systematic review

  • Kylie Teggart,
  • Sarah E. Neil-Sztramko,
  • Abbira Nadarajah,
  • Amy Wang,
  • Caroline Moore,
  • Nancy Carter,
  • Janet Adams,
  • Kamal Jain,
  • Penelope Petrie,
  • Aref Alshaikhahmed,
  • Shreya Yugendranag,
  • Rebecca Ganann

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09424-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 35

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Fragmented delivery of health and social services can impact access to high-quality, person-centred care. The goal of system navigation is to reduce barriers to healthcare access and improve the quality of care. However, the effectiveness of system navigation remains largely unknown. This systematic review aims to identify the effectiveness of system navigation programs linking primary care with community-based health and social services to improve patient, caregiver, and health system outcomes. Methods Building on a previous scoping review, PsychInfo, EMBASE, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Clinical Trials Registry were searched for intervention studies published between January 2013 and August 2020. Eligible studies included system navigation or social prescription programs for adults, based in primary care settings. Two independent reviewers completed study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction. Results Twenty-one studies were included; studies had generally low to moderate risk of bias. System navigation models were lay person-led (n = 10), health professional-led (n = 4), team-based (n = 6), or self-navigation with lay support as needed (n = 1). Evidence from three studies (low risk of bias) suggests that team-based system navigation may result in slightly more appropriate health service utilization compared to baseline or usual care. Evidence from four studies (moderate risk of bias) suggests that either lay person-led or health professional-led system navigation models may improve patient experiences with quality of care compared to usual care. It is unclear whether system navigation models may improve patient-related outcomes (e.g., health-related quality of life, health behaviours). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of system navigation programs on caregiver, cost-related, or social care outcomes. Conclusions There is variation in findings across system navigation models linking primary care with community-based health and social services. Team-based system navigation may result in slight improvements in health service utilization. Further research is needed to determine the effects on caregiver and cost-related outcomes.

Keywords