Bonding of orthodontic ceramic brackets: Optimal conditioning method of lithium disilicate restorations

Abstract

Introduction According to the data obtained from the American Orthodontic Society survey conducted in 2015, the number of adult patients that requested orthodontic treatment increased from 14% to 27% between 2010 and 2014. Because of the increased age of the patients, fixed orthodontic treatment is expected to be performed on restored teeth, including all ceramic restorations. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments on the bond strength of ceramic brackets to lithium disilicate ceramic and to determine the mode of fracture. Material and method 45 ceramic rectangular specimens were obtained from lithium disilicate CAD/CAM blocks which were divided in five groups according to the performed surface conditioning method: 1. grinding with a fine diamond bur (control group); 2. sandblasting with 29 mm alumina (Al2 O3 ); 3. etching with 4% hydrofluoric acid (HF); 4. sandblasting followed by conditioning with a universal primer - silanization (Al2 O3 + S); 5. HF acid etching followed by silanization (HF + S). Shear bond strength test was performed after storing the samples in water bath for 7 days. All of the fractured samples were analyzed with optical microscope to determine the type of fracture. Results HF acid etching followed by silanization performed the highest bond strength of 8.03 MPa, while sandblasting followed by silanization - 6.69 MPa. Mechanical surface conditioning with either HF acid etching or sandblasting resulted in significantly lower bond strength (2.65 MPa and 1.51 MPa respectively). Mainly adhesive mode of fractures was noticed after sandblasting and silanization, indicating minor chance of damaging the ceramic restoration after debonding, at the end of the orthodontic treatment, unlike the ceramic specimens in the Group 5 (HF + S) with 42.8% mixed and 14.4% cohesive fractures; 100% adhesive fractures were observed after mechanical treatments. Conclusion According to the SBS test results and fracture type, sandblasting followed by the application of a universal primer can be considered as an adequate method for conditioning the lithium disilicate ceramic restorations before the bonding of ceramic orthodontic brackets.

Keywords

• ceramic bracket
• conditioning methods
• lithium disilicate restoration
• sandblasting
• hydrofluoric acid
• universal primer