Comparison of osteogenic capability between porous Zn and porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds: An in vivo study

Abstract

Bioabsorbable zinc (Zn)-based materials for bone defect repair have received increasing attention. Based on 3D printing technology, this study innovatively designed and manufactured pure Zn and Ti6Al4V porous scaffolds. The pore size of the scaffold was 700 μm and the porosity was 70%. Compared with the traditional Ti6Al4V scaffolds, it was found that the Zn scaffolds had a larger deformation, the ultimate compressive stress was 18 MPa, but the ultimate strain could exceed 20%, while Ti6Al4V was only 6%. The elastic modulus of the Zn scaffolds was also lower than that of Ti6Al4V, which was 0.25 GPa, which can meet bone repair requirements in the non-weight-bearing area. However, Zn scaffolds had better strain capacity and lower elastic modulus, so they had less stress-shielding effect on bone. Degradation experiments also proved that the Zn scaffold had good degradation performance. Further in vivo and in vitro experiments showed that the Zn scaffolds had better osteogenic ability than the Ti6Al4V scaffolds. The findings of our study underscore the potential of integrating pure Zn into 3D printed scaffolds for their application in orthopedic scenarios.

Keywords

• Zn scaffolds
• Ti6Al4V scaffolds
• Bone defect repair
• Osteogenic capability
• Powder bed fusion-laser beam