Medicina (Jan 2023)

The Addition of Hypomethylating Agents to Low-Intensity Induction Chemotherapy Does Not Improve Outcomes in Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

  • Dan Liu,
  • Xiaoyu Wang,
  • Juan Tong,
  • Li Zhou,
  • Erling Chen,
  • Ziwei Zhou,
  • Lei Xue,
  • Xuhan Zhang,
  • Guangyu Sun,
  • Changcheng Zheng

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010114
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 59, no. 1
p. 114

Abstract

Read online

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate whether the addition of hypomethylating agents (HMA) to low-intensity chemotherapy can enhance the clinical efficacy of induction treatment for elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who are unsuitable for standard induction therapy. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 117 patients over 60 years old who were initially diagnosed with AML and received low-intensity induction treatment in the Department of Hematology in Anhui provincial hospital from January 2015 to December 2020. Twenty-three patients were excluded, and the remaining 94 patients were divided into two groups according to the selection of induction regimens. Results: Forty-four patients received HMA combined with low-intensity chemotherapy, and the other 50 patients received only low-intensity induction chemotherapy. Forty-three patients (45.7%) obtained complete remission (CR) after the initial induction treatment. The CR rate in the HMA plus low-intensity chemotherapy group was 34.1% (15/44), and in the single low-intensity chemotherapy group was 56.0% (28/50) (p = 0.04). The 30 days cumulative early death rates were 9.1% (95% CI: 3.5–22.4%) in the HMA plus low-intensity chemotherapy group and 6.0% (95% CI: 2.0–17.5%) in the single low-intensity chemotherapy group, respectively (p = 0.59), and the one-year cumulative relapse rates were 21.1% (95% Cl: 9.8–41.9%) and 33.3% (95% Cl: 20.3–51.5%), respectively (p = 0.80). The one-year overall survival (OS) rates for patients in the HMA plus low-intensity chemotherapy group and the single low-intensity chemotherapy group were 37.3% (95% Cl: 23.1–51.5%) and 55.4% (95% Cl: 40.5–67.9%), respectively (p = 0.098), and the one-year event-free survival (EFS) rates were 8.5% (95% Cl: 2.2–20.6%) and 20.6% (95% Cl: 9.1–35.3%), respectively (p = 0.058). Conclusions: This study showed that the addition of HMA to low-intensity induction chemotherapy does not improve prognosis in elderly AML patients who are unsuitable for standard induction chemotherapy.

Keywords