Energies (Sep 2024)
On the Use of a Chloride or Fluoride Salt Fuel System in Advanced Molten Salt Reactors, Part 3; Radiation Damage
Abstract
Structural materials in fast reactors with harsh radiation environments due to high energy neutrons—compared to thermal reactors—potentially suffer from a higher degree of radiation damage. This radiation damage can change the thermophysical and mechanical properties of materials and, as a result, alter their performance and effective lifetime, in some cases leading to their disintegration. These phenomena can jeopardize the safety of fast reactors and thus need to be investigated. In this study, the effect of radiation damage on the vessels of molten salt fast reactors (MSFR) was evaluated based on two fundamental radiation damage parameters: displacement per atom (dpa) and primary knock-on atom (pka). Following the previous part of this article (Parts 1 and 2), an iMAGINE reactor core design (University of Liverpool, UK—chloride-based salt fuel system) and an EVOL reactor core design (CNRS, Grenoble, France, fluoride-based salt fuel system) with stainless steel and nickel-based alloy material vessels, respectively, were considered as case studies. The SPECTER and SPECTRA-PKA codes and a PTRAC card of MCNPX, integrated with a module which has been developed in MATLAB, named PTRIM and SRIM-2013 (using binary collision approximation), were employed individually to calculate and compare dpa and PKA (this master module containing all three tools has been appended to the iMAGINE-3BIC package for future use during reactor operations). Additionally, SRIM-2013 was applied in a 3D simulation of a radiation damage map on a small sample of vessels based on the calculated PKA. Our results showed a higher degree of radiation damage in the iMAGINE vessel compared to the EVOL one, which could be expected due to the harder neutron flux spectrum of the iMAGINE core compared to EVOL. In addition, the nickel alloy vessel showed better radiation damage resistance against high energy neutrons compared to the stainless steel one, although more investigations are required on thermal neutrons and alloy corrosion mechanisms to determine the best material for use in MSFR vessels.
Keywords
