BMC Public Health (Nov 2024)

Trends in the use and nonmedical use of sedatives-hypnotics in the population aged 12 to 64 years in Taiwan: a comparative analysis of the national surveys in 2014 and 2018

  • Wei-Yi Tsay,
  • Lian-Yu Chen,
  • Shang-Chi Wu,
  • Po-Chang Hsiao,
  • Te-Tien Ting,
  • Cheng-Fang Yen,
  • Shu-Sen Chang,
  • Chung-Yi Li,
  • Hao-Jan Yang,
  • Chia-Feng Yen,
  • Chuan-Yu Chen,
  • Jiun-Hau Huang,
  • Yu-Kang Tu,
  • Wei J. Chen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20778-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Many countries, including Taiwan, have tightened regulations on prescribing sedatives-hypnotics over the concern of their associated adverse health effects. However, it remains seldom investigated whether different age-sex strata have differential trends in national surveys over time for either the use or nonmedical use (NMU) of sedatives-hypnotics. Comparing Taiwan’s two national surveys in 2014 and 2018, we aimed to examine (1) the population’s trends for the prevalence of past-year use and NMU of sedatives-hypnotics overall and in age-sex strata; (2) trends for sociodemographic subgroups for those age-sex strata with significant changes in past-year use and NMU of sedatives-hypnotics over time; and (3) trends for sources of and motives for NMU of sedatives-hypnotics. Methods The national survey enrolled 17,837 participants in 2014 (response rate = 62.2%) and 18,626 participants in 2018 (response rate = 64.6%) of citizens aged 12–64 years. Each participant anonymously completed a computer-assisted self-interview. The questionnaire consisted of sociodemographic variables and the use of various psychoactive substances and sedative-hypnotics, among others. NMU of sedative-hypnotics was defined as using the drug without a prescription, or more frequently, or in larger doses than prescribed. To compare the prevalence between the two waves, we conducted multivariable logistic regression analysis and the difference-in-differences in prevalence was examined with an interaction term between survey year and sex. Results We found decreasing trends in young adult (18–39 years old) males for both past-year use (3.07–2.29%) and NMU (0.84–0.18%), but increasing trends in adolescents (0.42–0.80%) and young adult females (2.91–3.81%) for past-year use and in adolescents (0.16–0.39%) and middle-aged adult (40–64 years old) females (0.73–1.14%) for past-year NMU of sedatives-hypnotics. Among the young and middle-aged adult females, the increasing trends for past-year use and NMU, respectively, were found to occur mainly in certain sociodemographic subgroups, with alcohol users being the overlapping subgroup. Conclusions The differential trends over time of past-year use or NMU of sedatives-hypnotics in different age-sex strata in the population have policy implications to curtail the increasing trend over time.

Keywords