BMJ Global Health (Nov 2022)

Canine real-time detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections in the context of a mass screening event

  • Holger Andreas Volk,
  • Tobias Welte,
  • Claudia Schulz,
  • Andreas Nitsche,
  • Thomas Illig,
  • Lothar Kreienbrock,
  • Maren von Köckritz-Blickwede,
  • Michael Peter Manns,
  • Nele Alexandra ten Hagen,
  • Friederike Twele,
  • Sebastian Meller,
  • Lisa Wijnen,
  • Clara Schoneberg,
  • Albert Osterhaus,
  • Anna-Lena Boeck,
  • Konstantin Boeck,
  • Viktoria Bonda,
  • Veronika Pilchová,
  • Franziska Karola Kaiser,
  • Mariana Gonzalez Hernandez,
  • Hans Ebbers,
  • Julia Hinsenkamp,
  • Isabell Pink,
  • Nora Drick,
  • Andreas Puyskens,
  • Christiane Ernst,
  • Michael Engels,
  • Esther Schalke

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010276
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 11

Abstract

Read online

Introduction Previous research demonstrated that medical scent detection dogs have the ability to distinguish SARS-CoV-2 positive from negative samples with high diagnostic accuracy. To deploy these dogs as a reliable screening method, it is mandatory to examine if canines maintain their high diagnostic accuracy in real-life screening settings. We conducted a study to evaluate the performance of medical scent detection dogs under real-life circumstances.Methods Eight dogs were trained to detect SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR-positive samples. Four concerts with a total of 2802 participants were held to evaluate canines’ performance in screening individuals for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sweat samples were taken from all participants and presented in a line-up setting. In addition, every participant had been tested with a SARS-CoV-2 specific rapid antigen test and a RT-qPCR and they provided information regarding age, sex, vaccination status and medical disease history. The participants’ infection status was unknown at the time of canine testing. Safety measures such as mask wearing and distance keeping were ensured.Results The SARS-CoV-2 detection dogs achieved a diagnostic specificity of 99.93% (95% CI 99.74% to 99.99%) and a sensitivity of 81.58% (95% CI 66.58% to 90.78%), respectively. The overall rate of concordant results was 99.68%. The majority of the study population was vaccinated with varying vaccines and vaccination schemes, while several participants had chronic diseases and were under chronic medication. This did not influence dogs’ decisions.Conclusion Our results demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 scent detection dogs achieved high diagnostic accuracy in a real-life scenario. The vaccination status, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, chronic disease and medication of the participants did not influence the performance of the dogs in detecting the acute infection. This indicates that dogs provide a fast and reliable screening option for public events in which high-throughput screening is required.