PLoS ONE (Jan 2015)

Nutritional Differences between Two Orangutan Habitats: Implications for Population Density.

  • Erin R Vogel,
  • Mark E Harrison,
  • Astri Zulfa,
  • Timothy D Bransford,
  • Shauhin E Alavi,
  • Simon Husson,
  • Helen Morrogh-Bernard,
  • Santiano,
  • Twentinolosa Firtsman,
  • Sri Suci Utami-Atmoko,
  • Maria A van Noordwijk,
  • Wartika Rosa Farida

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138612
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 10
p. e0138612

Abstract

Read online

Bottom-up regulatory factors have been proposed to exert a strong influence on mammalian population density. Studies relating habitat quality to population density have typically made comparisons among distant species or communities without considering variation in food quality among localities. We compared dietary nutritional quality of two Bornean orangutan populations with differing population densities in peatland habitats, Tuanan and Sabangau, separated by 63 km. We hypothesized that because Tuanan is alluvial, the plant species included in the orangutan diet would be of higher nutritional quality compared to Sabangau, resulting in higher daily caloric intake in Tuanan. We also predicted that forest productivity would be greater in Tuanan compared to Sabangau. In support of these hypotheses, the overall quality of the diet and the quality of matched dietary items were higher in Tuanan, resulting in higher daily caloric intake compared to Sabangau. These differences in dietary nutritional quality may provide insights into why orangutan population density is almost two times greater in Tuanan compared to Sabangau, in agreement with a potentially important influence of diet quality on primate population density.