PLoS ONE (Jan 2020)

Predictive validity of three home fall hazard assessment tools for older adults in Thailand.

  • Charupa Lektip,
  • Sarawut Lapmanee,
  • Thanapoom Rattananupong,
  • Vitool Lohsoonthorn,
  • Arnond Vorayingyong,
  • Thira Woratanarat,
  • Kitti-On Sirisuk,
  • Plaiwan Suttanon,
  • Rewwadee Petsirasan,
  • Parinya Kitidumrongsuk,
  • Wiroj Jiamjarasrangsi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244729
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 12
p. e0244729

Abstract

Read online

This study aimed to examine the predictive validity of two internationally well-known instruments, the Modified Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool (Modified HOME FAST) and the Modified Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool-Self Report (Modified HOME FAST-SR), and the newly developed Thai Home Falls Hazard Assessment Tool (Thai-HFHAT) (69 items) in predicting falls among older Thai adults. It also aimed to examine the predictive validity of the two abbreviated versions (44 and 27 items) of the Thai-HFHAT, which were developed post hoc to accommodate older adults' limited literacy and poor vision and to facilitate the identification of high-impact home fall hazards that are prevalent in the Thailand context. A prospective cohort study was conducted among 450 participants aged 60 years and above who were assessed by the aforementioned tools at baseline, for which data on fall incidence were then collected during the one-year follow-up. The Cox proportional hazard model was applied to estimate hazard ratios (HRs); then, Harrell's C-statistics and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted to identify the best cutoff point, sensitivity and specificity for each instrument. The results showed that the fall hazard rate was 2.04 times per 1,000 person-days. Taking into account both the predictive validity and applicability, the Thai-HFHAT (44 items) was found to be the most suitable screening tool due to its highest sensitivity and specificity (93% and 72%) at the cutoff score of 18. In conclusion, our study showed that these internationally validated home fall hazard assessment tools were quite applicable for Thailand, but further tailoring the tools into a specific local context yielded even more highly valid tools in predicting fall risk among older Thai adults. Although these findings were well reproducible by inferring from the internal validation results, further external validation in the independent population is necessary.