Systematic Reviews (Mar 2019)

Patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol

  • Julien Déry,
  • Angel Ruiz,
  • François Routhier,
  • Marie-Pierre Gagnon,
  • André Côté,
  • Daoud Ait-Kadi,
  • Valérie Bélanger,
  • Simon Deslauriers,
  • Marie-Eve Lamontagne

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-0992-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Waiting lists should be managed as fairly as possible to ensure that patients with greater or more urgent needs receive services first. Patient prioritization refers to the process of ranking referrals in a certain order based on various criteria with the aim of improving fairness and equity in the delivery of care. Despite the widespread use of patient prioritization tools (PPTs) in healthcare services, the existing literature on this subject has mainly focused on emergency settings. Evidence has not been synthesized with respect to all the non-emergency services. Methods This review aims to perform a systematic synthesis of published evidence concerning (1) prioritization tools’ characteristics, (2) their metrological properties, and (3) their effect measures across non-emergency services. Five electronic databases will be searched (Cochrane Library, Ovid/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL). Eligibility criteria guiding data selection will be (1) qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods empirical studies; (2) patient prioritization in any non-emergency setting; and (3) discussing characteristic, metrological properties, or effect measures. Data will be sought to report tool’s format, description, population, setting, purpose, criteria, developer, metrological properties, and outcome measures. Two reviewers will independently screen, select, and extract data. Data will be synthesized with sequential exploratory design method. We will use the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) to assess the quality of articles included in the review. Discussion This systematic review will provide much-needed knowledge regarding patient prioritization tools. The results will benefit clinicians, decision-makers, and researchers by giving them a better understanding of the methods used to prioritize patients in clinical settings. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42018107205

Keywords