Sport Mont (Sep 2010)
CONSEQUENCES OF INADEQUATE ENGAGEMENT OF EXPERTS FOR BUILDING SPORT FACILITIES IN BAR
Abstract
In Bar we still do not have experiance that for investments in sport facilities, sport experts are consulted. Such an approach to this problem put in question racional reasons for an investment? Consequences: Such facilities were not built in accordance with the sport rules and could not be registrated to the Sports Associations for performance of official sport competitions. 1. Hotel „Topolica“, 1980. year (open swimming pool), 2. OŠ „Anto Đedović“, 1983. year (asfaltfloor playground), 3. Sportsko-rekreativni centar Bar, 1986. year (tartan track i asfaltfloor playground), 4. OŠ „Meksiko“, 1987. year ( gim), 5. Sportsko-rekreativni centar Bar, 1987. year (stadium dressing room), 6. Sportsko-rekreativni centar Bar, 2004. year (tartan track i asfaltfloor playground, i cross-country track ) 7. Rekreativni parak „Oaza“, 2005. godine ( trim track reconstruction and artificial light instalement at „Oaza“), 8. Sportsko-rekreativni centar Bar, 2009. year (football – tennis pitch), Distorical and descriptive methods were used. Subject of inquiery were sport facilities where sport rules were not followed.Vanity of certain persons has been fulfilled, but not the needs of sport population. If there is a wish that sport facilities should be in the function of sport in its full capacity, it is necessary that during construction, reconstruction and adaptation of such facilities expers are to be engaged.
