BMJ Open (May 2024)

Sex and gender-based analysis and diversity metric reporting in acute care trials published in high-impact journals: a systematic review

  • Lehana Thabane,
  • Arnav Agarwal,
  • Valeria Raparelli,
  • Dipayan Chaudhuri,
  • Karen E A Burns,
  • Emilie Belley-Cote,
  • Frédérick D'Aragon,
  • Louise Pilote,
  • Vincent Issac Lau,
  • Kimia Honarmand,
  • David Granton,
  • Jan O Friedrich,
  • Vatsal Trivedi,
  • Varuna Prakash,
  • Daniel Wiseman,
  • Myanca Rodrigues,
  • Julie Reid,
  • Benedetta Perna,
  • Riccardo Spaggiari,
  • Valeria Fortunato,
  • Gianluca Risdonne,
  • Michelle Kho,
  • Sandra VanderKaay,
  • Carolina Gomez-Builes,
  • Celina Lin,
  • Maha Al Mandhari

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081118
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 5

Abstract

Read online

Objective To characterise sex and gender-based analysis (SGBA) and diversity metric reporting, representation of female/women participants in acute care trials and temporal changes in reporting before and after publication of the 2016 Sex and Gender Equity in Research guideline.Design Systematic review.Data sources We searched MEDLINE for trials published in five leading medical journals in 2014, 2018 and 2020.Study selection Trials that enrolled acutely ill adults, compared two or more interventions and reported at least one clinical outcome.Data abstraction and synthesis 4 reviewers screened citations and 22 reviewers abstracted data, in duplicate. We compared reporting differences between intensive care unit (ICU) and cardiology trials.Results We included 88 trials (75 (85.2%) ICU and 13 (14.8%) cardiology) (n=111 428; 38 140 (34.2%) females/women). Of 23 (26.1%) trials that reported an SGBA, most used a forest plot (22 (95.7%)), were prespecified (21 (91.3%)) and reported a sex-by-intervention interaction with a significance test (19 (82.6%)). Discordant sex and gender terminology were found between headings and subheadings within baseline characteristics tables (17/32 (53.1%)) and between baseline characteristics tables and SGBA (4/23 (17.4%)). Only 25 acute care trials (28.4%) reported race or ethnicity. Participants were predominantly white (78.8%) and male/men (65.8%). No trial reported gendered-social factors. SGBA reporting and female/women representation did not improve temporally. Compared with ICU trials, cardiology trials reported significantly more SGBA (15/75 (20%) vs 8/13 (61.5%) p=0.005).Conclusions Acute care trials in leading medical journals infrequently included SGBA, female/women and non-white trial participants, reported race or ethnicity and never reported gender-related factors. Substantial opportunity exists to improve SGBA and diversity metric reporting and recruitment of female/women participants in acute care trials.PROSPERO registration number CRD42022282565.