PLoS ONE (Jan 2022)

Patterns and prognosis of holding regimens for people living with HIV in Asian countries.

  • Jung Ho Kim,
  • Awachana Jiamsakul,
  • Sasisopin Kiertiburanakul,
  • Bui Vu Huy,
  • Suwimon Khusuwan,
  • Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy,
  • Oon Tek Ng,
  • Penh Sun Ly,
  • Man-Po Lee,
  • Yu-Jiun Chan,
  • Yasmin Mohamed Gani,
  • Iskandar Azwa,
  • Anchalee Avihingsanon,
  • Tuti Parwati Merati,
  • Sanjay Pujari,
  • Romanee Chaiwarith,
  • Fujie Zhang,
  • Junko Tanuma,
  • Cuong Duy Do,
  • Rossana Ditangco,
  • Evy Yunihastuti,
  • Jeremy Ross,
  • Jun Yong Choi,
  • IeDEA Asia-Pacific

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264157
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 3
p. e0264157

Abstract

Read online

The use of holding regimens for people living with HIV (PLWH) without effective antiretroviral options can have effects on outcomes and future treatment options. We aimed to investigate the use of holding regimens for PLWH in Asian countries. Data from adults enrolled in routine HIV care in IeDEA Asia-Pacific cohorts were included. Individuals were considered to be on holding regimen if they had been on combination antiretroviral therapy for at least 6 months, had two confirmed viral loads (VL) ≥1000 copies/mL, and had remained on the same medications for at least 6 months. Survival time was analyzed using Fine and Gray's competing risk regression. Factors associated with CD4 changes and VL 50 years compared to age 31-40 years (sub-hazard ratio [SHR] 3.29, 95% CI 1.45-7.43, p = 0.004), and VL ≥1000 copies/ml compared to VL <1000 copies/mL (SHR, 2.14, 95% CI 1.08-4.25, p = 0.029) were associated with increased mortality, while higher CD4 counts were protective. In our Asia regional cohort, there was a diversity of holding regimens, and the patterns of PI vs. NNRTI use differed by country income levels. Considering the high mortality rate of PLWH with holding regimen, efforts to extend accessibility to additional antiretroviral options are needed in our region.