Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Oct 2022)

Sigmoid isostiffness-lines: An in-vitro model for the assessment of aortic stenosis severity

  • Eric Buffle,
  • Eric Buffle,
  • Michael Stucki,
  • Michael Stucki,
  • Shaokai Zheng,
  • Maxime Chiarelli,
  • Christian Seiler,
  • Dominik Obrist,
  • Stefano F. de Marchi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.960170
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionThe aortic valve opening area (AVA), used to quantify aortic stenosis severity, depends on the transvalvular flow rate (Q). The currently accepted clinical echocardiographic method assumes a linear relation between AVA and Q. We studied whether a sigmoid model better describes this relation and determined “isostiffness-lines” across a wide flow spectrum, thus allowing building a nomogram for the non-invasive estimation of valve stiffness.MethodsBoth AVA and instantaneous Q (Qinst) were measured at 10 different mean cardiac outputs of porcine aortic valves mounted in a pulsatile flow loop. The valves' cusps were chemically stiffened to obtain three stiffness grades and the procedure was repeated for each grade. The relative stiffness was defined as the ratio between LV work at grade with the added stiffness and at native stiffness grade. AVApeak¯ corresponding to the selected Qpeak¯ of the highest 3 and 5 cardiac output values was predicted in K-fold cross-validation using sequentially a linear and a sigmoid model. The accuracy of each model was assessed with the Akaike information criterion (AIC).ResultsThe sigmoid model predicted more accurately AVApeak¯ (AIC for prediction of AVA with Qpeak¯ of the 3 highest cardiac output values: –1,743 vs. –1,048; 5 highest cardiac output values: –1,471 vs. –878) than the linear model.ConclusionThis study suggests that the relation between AVA and Q can be better described by a sigmoid than a linear model. This construction of “isostiffness-lines” may be a useful method for the assessment of aortic stenosis in clinical echocardiography.

Keywords