BMJ Open (May 2024)

Coordination of oral anticoagulant care at hospital discharge (COACHeD): pilot randomised controlled trial

  • Lehana Thabane,
  • Jean-Eric Tarride,
  • James Douketis,
  • Sam Schulman,
  • Anne Holbrook,
  • Deborah Siegal,
  • Jiawen Deng,
  • Sue Troyan,
  • Sylvia Hyland,
  • Amna Ahmed,
  • Victoria Telford,
  • Yousery Koubaesh,
  • Kristina Vidug,
  • Lindsay Yoo,
  • Simran Lohit,
  • Stephen Giilck,
  • Marianne Talman,
  • Blair Leonard,
  • Mohammad Refaei,
  • Joanne Man-Wai Ho

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079353
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 5

Abstract

Read online

Objectives To evaluate whether a focused, expert medication management intervention is feasible and potentially effective in preventing anticoagulation-related adverse events for patients transitioning from hospital to home.Design Randomised, parallel design.Setting Medical wards at six hospital sites in southern Ontario, Canada.Participants Adults 18 years of age or older being discharged to home on an oral anticoagulant (OAC) to be taken for at least 4 weeks.Interventions Clinical pharmacologist-led intervention, including a detailed discharge medication management plan, a circle of care handover and early postdischarge virtual check-up visits to 1 month with 3-month follow-up. The control group received the usual care.Outcomes measures Primary outcomes were study feasibility outcomes (recruitment, retention and cost per patient). Secondary outcomes included adverse anticoagulant safety events composite, quality of transitional care, quality of life, anticoagulant knowledge, satisfaction with care, problems with medications and health resource utilisation.Results Extensive periods of restriction of recruitment plus difficulties accessing patients at the time of discharge negatively impacted feasibility, especially cost per patient recruited. Of 845 patients screened, 167 were eligible and 56 were randomised. The mean age (±SD) was 71.2±12.5 years, 42.9% females, with two lost to follow-up. Intervention patients were more likely to rate their ability to manage their OAC as improved (17/27 (63.0%) vs 7/22 (31.8%), OR 3.6 (95% CI 1.1 to 12.0)) and their continuity of care as improved (21/27 (77.8%) vs 2/22 (9.1%), OR 35.0 (95% CI 6.3 to 194.2)). Fewer intervention patients were taking one or more inappropriate medications (7 (22.5%) vs 15 (60%), OR 0.19 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.62)).Conclusion This pilot randomised controlled trial suggests that a transitional care intervention at hospital discharge for older adults taking OACs was well received and potentially effective for some surrogate outcomes, but overly costly to proceed to a definitive large trial.Trial registration number NCT02777047.