Journal of Cotton Research (Jul 2024)

Boll weevils in dry bolls: is there a performance disadvantage?

  • Beatriz S. Coelho,
  • Suzany A. Leite,
  • Mateus P. dos Santos,
  • Eloito C. de Mates,
  • Beatriz M. L. de Moraes,
  • Cristina S. Bastos,
  • Raul N. C. Guedes,
  • Aldenise A. Moreira,
  • Maria A. Castellani

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-024-00186-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Anthonomus grandis grandis is the main cotton pest in the Americas, with the potential to become a pest in other continents. The insect uses the plant’s reproductive organs for feeding, oviposition, and survival strategies in the off-season, sheltering in dry bolls. This study aimed to know the reproductive potential, feeding, longevity, and morphometric characteristics of boll weevils from dry bolls, squares, and traps. Adults were obtained from infested squares, dry bolls, and traps installed in cotton fields and the Caatinga area. Thirty weevil pairs were maintained in the laboratory to assess the oviposition, feeding holes, longevity, and morphometric measurements of the parental and F1 generations. Results In the parental generation, boll weevils from traps (the Caatinga area and cotton cultivation) showed greater reproductive potential. Boll weevils from squares and the Caatinga area showed greater feeding activity compared with those from cotton cultivation. Greater rostrum length, thorax + abdomen length, and abdomen width were observed in boll weevils from cotton cultivation and dry bolls. The origin of boll weevils parental generation did not affect progeny emergence time. The F1 generation of boll weevils showed significant differences in average longevity depending on the origin of different microhabitats. Furthermore, differences in rostrum lengths were observed, with the boll weevils coming from traps installed in cotton cultivation, the Caatinga area, and dry bolls being the largest. Regarding thorax + abdomen length and abdomen width, the highest values were observed in those from the Caatinga area and cotton cultivation. Conclusion It was proven that dry bolls did not affect the reproductive, feeding, and longevity performance of boll weevils, enabling better insect fitness (reproduction and size) in relation to those coming from squares. The use of dry bolls as off-season shelter is an important survival strategy for the boll weevil.

Keywords