Blood Cancer Journal (Aug 2024)

Busulfan-fludarabine versus busulfan-cyclophosphamide for allogeneic transplant in acute myeloid leukemia: long term analysis of GITMO AML-R2 trial

  • Gianluca Cavallaro,
  • Anna Grassi,
  • Chiara Pavoni,
  • Maria Caterina Micò,
  • Alessandro Busca,
  • Irene Maria Cavattoni,
  • Stella Santarone,
  • Carlo Borghero,
  • Attilio Olivieri,
  • Giuseppe Milone,
  • Patrizia Chiusolo,
  • Pellegrino Musto,
  • Riccardo Saccardi,
  • Francesca Patriarca,
  • Fabrizio Pane,
  • Giorgia Saporiti,
  • Paolo Rivela,
  • Elisabetta Terruzzi,
  • Raffaella Cerretti,
  • Giuseppe Marotta,
  • Angelo Michele Carella,
  • Arnon Nagler,
  • Domenico Russo,
  • Paolo Corradini,
  • Paolo Bernasconi,
  • Anna Paola Iori,
  • Luca Castagna,
  • Nicola Mordini,
  • Elena Oldani,
  • Carmen Di Grazia,
  • Andrea Bacigalupo,
  • Alessandro Rambaldi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-024-01116-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract We report the long-term results of a randomized trial (GITMO, AML-R2), comparing 1:1 the combination of busulfan and cyclophosphamide (BuCy2, n = 125) and the combination of busulfan and fludarabine (BuFlu, n = 127) as conditioning regimen in acute myeloid leukemia patients (median age 51 years, range 40–65) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. With a median follow-up of 6 years, significantly better non-relapse mortality (NRM) was confirmed in BuFlu recipients, which is sustained up to 4 years after transplant (10% vs. 20%, p = 0.0388). This difference was higher in patients older than 51 years (11% in BuFlu vs. 27% in BuCy2, p = 0.0262). The cumulative incidence of relapse, which was the first cause of death in the entire study population, did not differ between the two randomized arms. Similarly, the leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) were not different in the two cohorts, even when stratifying patients per median age. Graft-and relapse-free survival (GRFS) in BuFlu arm vs. the BuCy2 arm was 25% vs. 20% at 4 years and 20% vs. 17% at 10 years. Hence, the benefit gained by NRM reduction is not offsets by an increased relapse. Leukemia relapse remains a major concern, urging the development of new therapeutic approaches.