Frontiers in Oncology (Aug 2022)

Characterization of ex vivo and in vivo intraoperative neurosurgical confocal laser endomicroscopy imaging

  • Yuan Xu,
  • Irakliy Abramov,
  • Evgenii Belykh,
  • Giancarlo Mignucci-Jiménez,
  • Marian T. Park,
  • Jennifer M. Eschbacher,
  • Mark C. Preul

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.979748
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThe new US Food and Drug Administration-cleared fluorescein sodium (FNa)-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) imaging system allows for intraoperative on-the-fly cellular level imaging. Two feasibility studies have been completed with intraoperative use of this CLE system in ex vivo and in vivo modalities. This study quantitatively compares the image quality and diagnostic performance of ex vivo and in vivo CLE imaging.MethodsImages acquired from two prospective CLE clinical studies, one ex vivo and one in vivo, were analyzed quantitatively. Two image quality parameters – brightness and contrast – were measured using Fiji software and compared between ex vivo and in vivo images for imaging timing from FNa dose and in glioma, meningioma, and intracranial metastatic tumor cases. The diagnostic performance of the two studies was compared.ResultsOverall, the in vivo images have higher brightness and contrast than the ex vivo images (p < 0.001). A weak negative correlation exists between image quality and timing of imaging after FNa dose for the ex vivo images, but not the in vivo images. In vivo images have higher image quality than ex vivo images (p < 0.001) in glioma, meningioma, and intracranial metastatic tumor cases. In vivo imaging yielded higher sensitivity and negative predictive value than ex vivo imaging.ConclusionsIn our setting, in vivo CLE optical biopsy outperforms ex vivo CLE by producing higher quality images and less image deterioration, leading to better diagnostic performance. These results support the in vivo modality as the modality of choice for intraoperative CLE imaging.

Keywords