GMS Journal for Medical Education (Feb 2020)

Development, implementation, and evaluation of a curriculum for medical students on conflicts of interest and communicating risk

  • Deis, Nicole,
  • Koch, Cora,
  • Dreimüller, Nadine,
  • Gaitzsch, Eva,
  • Weißkircher, Jens,
  • Jünger, Jana,
  • Lieb, Klaus

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001296
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 37, no. 1
p. Doc3

Abstract

Read online

Background: Insufficient risk competence of physicians, conflicts of interests from interactions with pharmaceutical companies, and the often distorted presentation of benefits and risks of therapies compromise the advising of patients by physicians in the framework of shared decision-making. An important cause of this is that teaching on this subject is mostly lacking, or fragmented when it does take place , , , . Even though the defines learning goals on the topics of conflicts of interest and communication of risk, there are no classes that integrate both topics. Our goal was to develop a model curriculum to teach conflicts of interest and communication of risk that would integrate statistical know-how, communicational competency on the presentation of benefits and risks, and the meaning and management of conflicts of interest.Project Description: The development of the curriculum took place according to the six-step cycle of Kern et al . An integrated curriculum was conceptualized, piloted, and adapted with the support of experts for the topics of shared decision-making, conflicts of interest, and communication of risk. The final version of the curriculum was implemented at the medical schools of Mainz and Heidelberg and evaluated by the students.Results: The final curriculum consists of 19 lesson units. The contents are the fundamentals of statistics, theory of risk communication, practical exercises on communication of risk, and the fundamentals of the mechanisms of effect of conflicts of interest, recognition of distortions in data, and introductions to professional management of conflicts of interest. The course was implemented three times at two different medical schools with a total of 32 students, and it was positively rated by most of the 27 participating students who evaluated it on the 1-6 German school grading scale (mean: 1.4; SD: 0.49; range: 1-2).Discussion: The curriculum we developed fills a gap in the current medical education. The innovative concept, which sensibly connects the transmission of theory and practice, was positively received by the students. The next steps are an evaluation of the curriculum by means of a two-center randomized study and the implementation at German and international medical schools. The process should be accompanied by continuous evaluation and further improvement.

Keywords