Influence of a rural Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship on medical graduates’ geographic and specialty decisions: a constructivist grounded theory study

Abstract

Abstract Background Like many countries, Australia is suffering from a longstanding and persistent medical workforce maldistribution with fewer doctors per capita in rural locations and a trend towards sub-specialisation. Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships (LIC), a medical education model, are more likely than other clerkship models to produce graduates who work rurally, in communities of increasing remoteness and in primary care. While this quantitative data is essential, there has been a dearth of program-specific evidence explaining this phenomenon. Methods To address this knowledge gap, a constructivist qualitative grounded theory approach was employed to identify how the Deakin University comprehensive rural LIC influences graduates’ (2011–2020) career decisions in terms of both medical specialty and geographic practice location. Results Thirty-nine graduates participated in qualitative interviews. The Rural LIC Career Decision Making Framework was developed, postulating that an alignment of personal and program factors under the central concept of ‘choosing to participate’ can influence graduates’ geographic and specialist career decisions, both individually and symbiotically. Once embedded in the clerkship, participation was augmented by the concepts of learning design affordance and learning in place, providing the participants with longitudinal opportunities to experience and compare medical disciplines in an integrated manner. Conclusions The developed framework presents contextual elements of the program that were deemed influential on graduates’ subsequent career decisions. The alignment of these elements with the program’s mission statement has the capacity to enhance the program’s rural workforce goals. Regardless of graduates’ willingness to participate in the program, a transformation occurred. Transformation occurs through reflection, either challenging or confirming the graduate’s pre-conceived ideas about career decisions and in turn influencing professional identity formation.