Gut and Liver (Nov 2024)

Combi-Elastography versus Transient Elastography for Assessing the Histological Severity of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease

  • Yun Kyu Lee,
  • Dong Hyeon Lee,
  • Sae Kyung Joo,
  • Heejoon Jang,
  • Young Ho So,
  • Siwon Jang,
  • Dong Ho Lee,
  • Jeong Hwan Park,
  • Mee Soo Chang,
  • Won Kim,
  • Innovative Target Exploration of NAFLD (ITEN) Consortium

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl240198
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 6
pp. 1048 – 1059

Abstract

Read online

Background/Aims: Combi-elastography is a B-mode ultrasound-based method in which two elastography modalities are utilized simultaneously to assess metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). However, the performance of combi-elastography for diagnosing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and determining fibrosis severity is unclear. This study compared the diagnostic performances of combi-elastography and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) for identifying hepatic steatosis, fibrosis, and high-risk MASH.Methods: Participants who underwent combi-elastography, VCTE, and liver biopsy were selected from a prospective cohort of patients with clinically suspected MASLD. Combi-elastography-related parameters were acquired, and their performances were evaluated using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis.Results: A total of 212 participants were included. The diagnostic performance for hepatic steatosis of the attenuation coefficient adjusted by covariates from combi-elastography was comparable to that of the controlled attenuation parameter measured by VCTE (AUROC, 0.85 vs 0.85; p=0.925). The performance of the combi-elastography-derived fibrosis index adjusted by covariates for diagnosing significant fibrosis was comparable to that of liver stiffness measured by VCTE (AUROC, 0.77 vs 0.80; p=0.573). The activity index from combi-elastography adjusted by covariates was equivalent to the FibroScan-aspartate aminotransferase score in diagnosing high-risk MASH among participants with MASLD (AUROC, 0.72 vs 0.74; p=0.792).Conclusions: The performance of combi-elastography is similar to that of VCTE when evaluating histology of MASLD.

Keywords