BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (Jun 2024)

Quantitative prediction of postpartum hemorrhage in cesarean section on machine learning

  • Meng Wang,
  • Gao Yi,
  • Yunjia Zhang,
  • Mei Li,
  • Jin Zhang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02571-7
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 18

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Cesarean section-induced postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) potentially causes anemia and hypovolemic shock in pregnant women. Hence, it is helpful for obstetricians and anesthesiologists to prepare pre-emptive prevention when predicting PPH occurrence in advance. However, current works on PPH prediction focus on whether PPH occurs rather than assessing PPH amount. To this end, this work studies quantitative PPH prediction with machine learning (ML). Methods The study cohort in this paper was selected from individuals with PPH who were hospitalized at Shijiazhuang Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from 2020 to 2022. In this study cohort, we built a dataset with 6,144 subjects covering clinical parameters, anesthesia operation records, laboratory examination results, and other information in the electronic medical record system. Based on our built dataset, we exploit six different ML models, including logistic regression, linear regression, gradient boosting, XGBoost, multilayer perceptron, and random forest, to automatically predict the amount of bleeding during cesarean section. Eighty percent of the dataset was used as model training, and 20 $$\%$$ % was used for verification. Those ML models are constantly verified and improved by root mean squared error(RMSE) and mean absolute error(MAE). Moreover, we also leverage the importance of permutation and partial dependence plot (PDP) to discuss their feasibility. Result The experiment results show that random forest obtains the highest accuracy for PPH amount prediction compared to other ML methods. Random forest reaches the mean absolute error of 21.7, less than 5.4 $$\%$$ % prediction error. It also gains the root mean squared error of 33.75, less than 9.3 $$\%$$ % prediction error. On the other hand, the experimental results also disclose indicators that contributed most to PPH prediction, including Ca, hemoglobin, white blood cells, platelets, Na, and K. Conclusion It effectively predicts the amount of PPH during a cesarean section by ML methods, especially random forest. With the above insight, ML predicting PPH amounts provides early warning for clinicians, thus reducing complications and improving cesarean sections’ safety. Furthermore, the importance of ML and permutation, complemented by incorporating PDP, promises to provide clinicians with a transparent indication of individual risk prediction.

Keywords