Voided volume may not impact stone outcomes: Review of a large institutional nephrolithiasis cohort

Abstract

Abstract Background Urologic guidelines universally recommend increasing fluid intake for kidney stone prevention. Increased voided volume is thought to help reduce stone recurrence and severity, but supporting evidence is limited. Patients and Methods Nephrolithiasis outcomes and 24‐h urine data for patients from the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter (ReSKU), a registry of nephrolithiasis patients collected between 2015 and 2020, were retrospectively analysed. Outcome was stone events, either an office visit where a patient reports symptomatic passage of stones or surgery for stone removal. Results We identified 450 stone patients with 24‐h urine and kidney stone outcome data. There was no significant difference in 24‐h voided volume between patients with one stone event and patients with two or more stone events. On multivariable logistic regression, after controlling for age, gender, BMI, and 24‐h sodium and creatinine per kilogram, no significant associations were found between voided volume and stone events. There was a statistically significant negative correlation noted between voided volume and stone events in calcium oxalate dihydrate stone formers (Spearman R = −0.42, p = 0.04), but not others. Conclusions Twenty‐four‐hour voided volume was not associated with stone events in a large institutional cohort, and subset analysis reveals that some stone formers may benefit more from increased voided volume than others; identifying such patients represents a novel precision medicine opportunity.

Keywords

• 24‐h urine
• nephrolithiasis
• outcomes
• registry
• voided volume