Methods for Clinical Monitoring of Neuromuscular Transmission in Anesthesiology – a Review [Corrigendum]

Abstract

Radkowski P, Barańska A, Mieszkowski M, Dawidowska-Fidrych J, Podhorodecka K. Int J Gen Med. 2024;17:9–20. The authors have advised there is an error in the text on page 14 of the published paper. Page 14, Electromyography, sentences 9 and 10, the text “Two new electromyography devices TwichView (Blink Device Co, Seattle, United States) and TetraGraph (Senzime, Uppsala, Sweden) are recently accepted by the FDA. In the pilot study, which compares TetraGraph with TwichView authors find that the TetraGraph underestimated the post-tetanic-count, train-of-four count and train-of-four” should read “Two new electromyography devices TwichView (Blink Device Co, Seattle, United States) and the GE NMT Module (GE HealthCare) are recently accepted by the FDA. In the pilot study, which compares the GE NMT Module with TwichView authors find that the GE NMT Module underestimated the post-tetanic-count, train-of-four count and train-of-four”. The authors have also advised there is an error with the reference list on page 20. Reference 43 should read as follows. 43. Bussey L, Jelacic S, Togashi K, et al. Train-of-four monitoring with the twitchview monitor electctromyograph compared to the GE NMT electromyograph and manual palpation. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021;35:1477–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00615-7

Keywords

• neuromuscular monitoring
• neuromuscular blockade
• peripheral nerve stimulation
• anesthesiology
• review