PLoS ONE (Jan 2015)

Patient and Staff Perceptions of Intradialytic Exercise before and after Implementation: A Qualitative Study.

  • Hannah M L Young,
  • Nicky Hudson,
  • Amy L Clarke,
  • Maurice Dungey,
  • John Feehally,
  • James O Burton,
  • Alice C Smith

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128995
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 6
p. e0128995

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionDespite guidance and evidence for the beneficial effects of intradialytic exercise (IDE), such programmes are rarely adopted within practice and little is known about how they may best be sustained. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to guide the understanding of the barriers and facilitators to initial and ongoing IDE participation and to understand how these are influential at each stage.Materials and methodsFocus groups explored patient (n=24) and staff (n=9) perceptions of IDE prior to the introduction of a programme and, six months later, face to face semi-structured interviews captured exercising patients (n=11) and staffs' (n=8) actual experiences. Data were collected at private and NHS haemodialysis units within the UK. All data were audio-recorded, translated where necessary, transcribed verbatim and subject to framework analysis.ResultsIDE initiation can be facilitated by addressing the pre-existing beliefs about IDE through the influence of peers (for patients) and training (for staff). Participation was sustained through the observation of positive outcomes and through social influences such as teamwork and collaboration. Despite this, environment and resource limitations remained the greatest barrier perceived by both groups.ConclusionsNovel methods of staff training and patient education should enhance engagement. Programmes that clearly highlight the benefits of IDE should be more successful in the longer term. The barrier of staff workload needs to be addressed through specific guidance that includes recommendations on staffing levels, roles, training and skill mix.