Ultrasonography guided erector spinae block in spinal surgery for pain management with enhanced recovery: A comparative study

Abstract

Background: Improved and efficient management of pain can certainly aid enhanced recovery after spinal surgery. Our aim is to evaluate the effect of ESPB in thoracic and lumbar surgeries where we have evaluated VAS for pain, cumulative analgesics consumptions, length of hospital stay and post-operative complications. Methods: A cross-sectional comparative study done in HAMS among the erector spinae block group and control group. The analysis of different variable was done according to standard statistical analysis. For quantitative data, univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to determine statistically significant differences using student's t-test for continuous variables. Results: 60 patients were analyzed, 30 got spinae block and 30 in control group.The mean pain score for spinae block group were 1.90 ± 0.712 and 3.27 ± 1.230 for control group (p < 0.001). Cumulative mean analgesic consumption values for spinae block vs. control groups were 0.030 ± 0.042 mg vs. 0.091 ± 0.891 mg (p = 0.001) for fentanyl; 1.06E4 ± 2833.300 mg vs. 1.53E4 ± 2848.349 mg (p < 0.001) for paracetamol; 213 ± 64.656 mg vs. 494 ± 58.816 mg (p < 0.001) for ketorol; 5440.00 ± 2060.064 mg vs. 8667.50 ± 2275.006 mg (p < 0.001) for ibuprofen and 121.67 ± 31.303 mg vs. 185.00 ± 51.108 mg (p < 0.001) for tramadol. Conclusions: The ESPB technique shows early discharge from hospital and lower cumulative analgesics consumption which indicates enhanced recovery after spine surgery than control group. Improvement of pain using VAS shows immediate post-operative period recovery in those who receives spinae block.

Keywords

• VAS
• ESPB
• ERAS