Journal of Foot and Ankle Research (Jan 2015)

Pedobarographic and kinematic analysis in the functional evaluation of two post‐operative forefoot offloading shoes

  • Paolo Caravaggi,
  • Alessia Giangrande,
  • Lisa Berti,
  • Giada Lullini,
  • Alberto Leardini

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0116-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Forefoot offloading shoes are special orthopaedic footwear designed to protect and unload the injured part of the foot after surgery and for conservative treatments. The offloading action is often achieved by transferring plantar load to the rearfoot via rocker shoes with reduced contact area between shoe and ground. While these shoes are intended to be worn only for short periods, a compromise must be found between functionality and the risk of alterations in gait patterns at the lower limb joints. In this study, the pedobarographic, kinematic and kinetic effects of a traditional half‐shoe and a double‐rocker full‐outsole shoe were compared to those of a comfortable shoe (control). Methods Ten healthy female participants (28.2 ± 10.0 years) were asked to walk in three different footwear conditions for the left/right foot: control/half‐shoe, control/full‐outsole, and control/control. Full gait analysis was obtained in three walking trials for each participant in each condition. Simultaneously a sensor insole system recorded plantar pressure in different foot regions. Normalized root‐mean‐square error, coefficient of determination, and frame‐by‐frame statistical analysis were used to assess differences in time‐histories of kinematic and kinetic parameters between shoes. Results The half ‐shoe group showed the slowest walking speed and the shortest stride length. Forefoot plantar load was significantly reduced in the half‐shoe (maximum force as % of Body Weight: half‐shoe = 62.1; full‐outsole = 86.9; control = 93.5; p < 0.001). At the rearfoot, mean pressure was the highest in the full‐outsole shoe. At the ankle, sagittal‐plane kinematics in the full‐outsole shoe had a pattern more similar to control. Conclusions The half‐shoe appears significantly more effective in reducing plantar load at the forefoot than a double‐rocker full‐outsole shoe, which is designed to reduce forefoot loading by using an insole with a thicker profile anteriorly as to maintain the foot in slight dorsiflexion. However, the half‐shoe is also associated with altered gait spatio‐temporal parameters, more kinematic modifications at the proximal lower limb joints and reduced propulsion in late stance.

Keywords