Viruses (Feb 2024)

Prognostic Value of D-dimer to Lymphocyte Ratio (DLR) in Hospitalized Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients: A Validation Study in a National Cohort

  • Crhistian-Mario Oblitas,
  • Pablo Demelo-Rodríguez,
  • Luis-Antonio Alvarez-Sala-Walther,
  • Manuel Rubio-Rivas,
  • Francisco Navarro-Romero,
  • Vicente Giner Galvañ,
  • Lucía de Jorge-Huerta,
  • Eva Fonseca Aizpuru,
  • Gema María García García,
  • José Luis Beato Pérez,
  • Paula María Pesqueira Fontan,
  • Arturo Artero Mora,
  • Juan Antonio Vargas Núñez,
  • Nuria Ramírez Perea,
  • José Miguel García Bruñén,
  • Emilia Roy Vallejo,
  • Isabel Perales-Fraile,
  • Ricardo Gil Sánchez,
  • José López Castro,
  • Ángel Luis Martínez González,
  • Luis Felipe Díez García,
  • Marina Aroza Espinar,
  • José-Manuel Casas-Rojo,
  • Jesús Millán Núñez-Cortés

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/v16030335
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 3
p. 335

Abstract

Read online

Background: This study aimed to validate the role of the D-dimer to lymphocyte ratio (DLR) for mortality prediction in a large national cohort of hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Methods: A retrospective, multicenter, observational study that included hospitalized patients due to SARS-CoV-2 infection in Spain was conducted from March 2020 to March 2022. All biomarkers and laboratory indices analyzed were measured once at admission. Results: A total of 10,575 COVID-19 patients were included in this study. The mean age of participants was 66.9 (±16) years, and 58.6% (6202 patients) of them were male. The overall mortality rate was 16.3% (n = 1726 patients). Intensive care unit admission was needed in 10.5% (n = 1106 patients), non-invasive mechanical ventilation was required in 8.8% (n = 923 patients), and orotracheal intubation was required in 7.5% (789 patients). DLR presented a c-statistic of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.68–0.71) for in-hospital mortality with an optimal cut-off above 1. Multivariate analysis showed an independent association for in-hospital mortality for DLR > 1 (adjusted OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.09–4.04; p = 0.03); in the same way, survival analysis showed a higher mortality risk for DLR > 1 (HR 2.24; 95% CI 2.03–2.47; p < 0.01). Further, no other laboratory indices showed an independent association for mortality in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: This study confirmed the usefulness of DLR as a prognostic biomarker for mortality associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, being an accessible, cost-effective, and easy-to-use biomarker in daily clinical practice.

Keywords