PLoS ONE (Jan 2024)

Computerized decision support is an effective approach to select memory clinic patients for amyloid-PET.

  • Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester,
  • Ingrid S van Maurik,
  • Lyduine E Collij,
  • Aniek M van Gils,
  • Juha Koikkalainen,
  • Antti Tolonen,
  • Yolande A L Pijnenburg,
  • Johannes Berkhof,
  • Frederik Barkhof,
  • Elsmarieke van de Giessen,
  • Jyrki Lötjönen,
  • Wiesje M van der Flier

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303111
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 5
p. e0303111

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThe use of amyloid-PET in dementia workup is upcoming. At the same time, amyloid-PET is costly and limitedly available. While the appropriate use criteria (AUC) aim for optimal use of amyloid-PET, their limited sensitivity hinders the translation to clinical practice. Therefore, there is a need for tools that guide selection of patients for whom amyloid-PET has the most clinical utility. We aimed to develop a computerized decision support approach to select patients for amyloid-PET.MethodsWe included 286 subjects (135 controls, 108 Alzheimer's disease dementia, 33 frontotemporal lobe dementia, and 10 vascular dementia) from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort, with available neuropsychology, APOE, MRI and [18F]florbetaben amyloid-PET. In our computerized decision support approach, using supervised machine learning based on the DSI classifier, we first classified the subjects using only neuropsychology, APOE, and quantified MRI. Then, for subjects with uncertain classification (probability of correct class (PCC) ResultsThe computerized approach advised PET in n = 60(21%) patients, leading to a diagnosis with sufficient certainty in n = 188(66%) patients. This approach was more efficient than the other three scenarios: 1) without amyloid-PET, diagnostic classification was obtained in n = 155(54%), 2) applying the AUC resulted in amyloid-PET in n = 113(40%) and diagnostic classification in n = 156(55%), and 3) performing amyloid-PET in all resulted in diagnostic classification in n = 154(54%).ConclusionOur computerized data-driven approach selected 21% of memory clinic patients for amyloid-PET, without compromising diagnostic performance. Our work contributes to a cost-effective implementation and could support clinicians in making a balanced decision in ordering additional amyloid PET during the dementia workup.